Page 187 - JOURNAL OF THE KRISHNAMURTI SCHOOLS
P. 187

What is Krishnamurti Saying?


              relevant psychological process involved is elusive. The best one
              can say is that, overall, something seems to be OK, even at times
              great, but don’t rely on that, it may not be tomorrow. A leading
              American physician wrote of every medical diagnosis, “You have
              to face the stark reality of uncertainty.” Not that uncertainty in
              life has always to be ‘stark’—it might turn out sometimes to be
              blissful!
                An all-encompassing area of interest to me in K is his con-
              stant stressing of the limitation—inherent limitation—of thought,
              knowledge and experience, and therefore of action based on that.
              Except for science and technology, this limitation applies across
              the board, to personal, family, professional, and international rela-
              tions. Yet our educational systems award their highest praise to
              thought and knowledge, placing them firmly on a golden pedestal.
              K knocks them firmly off this pedestal. But the strong unspoken
              public assumption remains, as the Oxford Dictionary of Philoso-
              phy puts it, that ‘the most evident display of our rationality is our
              capacity to think.’ We seem to ignore the fact that it is also the most
              evident display of our irrationality. This hasn’t been easy for me to
              digest. The first one in our family to go to a university, I graduated
              as a fully paid up, card-carrying intellectual, convinced that think-
              ing was the royal way to go. Part of my further education in the
              deep sense has been to unpack much, though not all, of my formal
              education.
                Has the meeting of K with the theoretical physicist David Bohm
              a special significance for us? Perhaps even some kind of allegori-
              cal significance? Organized religions tussle with science, are often
              decried by it. But K says that the scientific mind is part of the reli-
              gious mind. That is perhaps keenly relevant nowadays when neu-
              roscience willingly describes the self as an illusion created by the
              brain. When in the late 1960s K began to speak of mutation of
              the brain cells, at roughly the same time the scientist Fernando



                                          169
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192