Page 140 - JOURNAL OF THE KRISHNAMURTI SCHOOLS
P. 140

the journal of the krishnamurti schools no.25


              directly. Refusing to discuss books or theories, he encouraged
              people to look at themselves, particularly in their relationships to
              other people, things, and activities, and he told them just enough
              about what he thought they would see if they did look, to get them
              going. It is as if through the habit of understanding ourselves in
              familiar ways we are even at the level of experience stuck in theo-
              ries. Krishnamurti was—is—extremely good at helping people to
              get unstuck, that is, at helping them to have insights that break the
              moulds of deeply ingrained patterns of thinking. In other words, his
              concern was not that his remarks be relevant to theory—although
              often they are—but that they be relevant to life. His intention was
              to engage with people who are passionately interested in under-
              standing themselves and the world in which they live. The point of
              this engagement was to clarify what it means to be oneself and to
              live in this world. In my opinion, Krishnamurti succeeds in this as
              few others have.
                Philosophers and students of philosophy are surely among those
              who are passionately interested in understanding themselves and
              the world. Many of us have devoted much of our lives to this proj-
              ect. We may be surprised, then, to discover how little time and
              energy we have spent in the sort of inquiry Krishnamurti tried
              to facilitate. The reason for this is that Krishnamurti’s approach
              to topics of perennial philosophical interest was more meditative
              than rationally discursive. So, the question for philosophers and
              students of philosophy in considering how seriously they should
              take [his teachings], is whether they’re willing to try an approach
              that’s philosophical, in a broad sense, but so different from what
              they’re accustomed to doing when they think about or read phi-
              losophy that it may be difficult at first for them even to see its
              relevance. True philosophers are always open to new approaches.
              Indeed, when an approach has promise, the more radically new,
              the better.



                                          122
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145